| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 13:22:43 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 9/9] vhost: zerocopy: poll vq in zerocopy callback
On 05/17/2012 03:08 AM, Shirley Ma wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 21:36 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:32:05AM -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 18:14 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 08:10:27AM -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 10:58 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>>>>> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 1 +
>>>>>>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>>>>>>>> index 947f00d..7b75fdf 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -1604,6 +1604,7 @@ void vhost_zerocopy_callback(void
>> *arg)
>>>>>>>> struct vhost_ubuf_ref *ubufs = ubuf->arg;
>>>>>>>> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = ubufs->vq;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> + vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
>>>>>>>> /* set len = 1 to mark this desc buffers done DMA
>> */
>>>>>>>> vq->heads[ubuf->desc].len = VHOST_DMA_DONE_LEN;
>>>>>>>> kref_put(&ubufs->kref,
>> vhost_zerocopy_done_signal);
>>>>>>> Doing so, we might have redundant vhost_poll_queue(). Do you
>>>> know in
>>>>>>> which scenario there might be missing of adding and
>> signaling
>>>> during
>>>>>>> zerocopy?
>>>>>> Yes, as we only do signaling and adding during tx work, if
>> there's
>>>> no
>>>>>> tx
>>>>>> work when the skb were sent, we may lose the opportunity to
>> let
>>>> guest
>>>>>> know about the completion. It's easy to be reproduced with
>> netperf
>>>>>> test.
>>>>> The reason which host signals guest is to free guest tx buffers,
>> if
>>>>> there is no tx work, then it's not necessary to signal the guest
>>>> unless
>>>>> guest runs out of memory. The pending buffers will be released
>>>>> virtio_net device gone.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the behavior of netperf test when you hit this situation?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Shirley
>>>> IIRC guest networking seems to be lost.
>>> It seems vhost_enable_notify is missing in somewhere else?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Shirley
>> Donnu. I see virtio sending packets but they do not get
>> to tun on host. debugging.
> I looked at the code, if (zerocopy) check is needed for below code:
>
> + if (zerocopy) {
> num_pends = likely(vq->upend_idx>= vq->done_idx) ?
> (vq->upend_idx - vq->done_idx) :
> (vq->upend_idx + UIO_MAXIOV - vq->done_idx);
> if (unlikely(num_pends> VHOST_MAX_PEND)) {
> tx_poll_start(net, sock);
> vhost_poll_queue
> set_bit(SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE,&sock->flags);
> break;
> }
> + }
> if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
> vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
> continue;
> }
> break;
No objection to add this but looks no difference to me as we won't touch
upend_idx and done_idx when zercocopy is not used.
>
> Second, whether it's possible the problem comes from tx_poll_start()? In
> some situation, vhost_poll_wakeup() is not being called?
>
> Thanks
> Shirley
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists