[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4FBB8544.3040408@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 21:23:32 +0900
From: Chanyeol Park <chanyeol.park@...sung.com>
To: Minho Ban <mhban@...sung.com>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Bluetooth: prevent double l2cap_chan_destroy
Hi
On 2012년 05월 22일 11:50, Minho Ban wrote:
> @@ -1343,10 +1343,10 @@ static void l2cap_conn_del(struct hci_conn *hcon, int err)
> l2cap_chan_lock(chan);
>
> l2cap_chan_del(chan, err);
> + chan->ops->close(chan->data);
>
> l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
>
> - chan->ops->close(chan->data);
> l2cap_chan_put(chan);
> }
I think this patch does not make sense Because inside chan->ops->close()
"chan" could be freed in the l2cap_chan_destroy().
> close callback must locate within chan_lock unless it can be scheduled to other thread
> which may wait for chan_lock in l2cap_sock_shutdown and this lead to duplicate sock_kill.
>
> static void l2cap_sock_kill(struct sock *sk)
> {
> - if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED) || sk->sk_socket)
> + if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED) || sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD) ||
> + sk->sk_socket)
> return;
>
> BT_DBG("sk %p state %s", sk, state_to_string(sk->sk_state));
>
> Duplicate sock_kill may happen anyway, need test SOCK_DEAD if chan_destroy is already called.
Even l2cap_sock_kill() is called twice, " if (!sock_flag(sk,
SOCK_ZAPPED) || sk->sk_socket)" can't filter it.
I tested Mr.ban case. it works fine with me.
BR
Chanyeol Park.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists