netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/4] stmmac: remove two useless initialisation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120523.024211.816676351593259308.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 23 May 2012 02:42:11 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	peppe.cavallaro@...com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] stmmac: remove two useless initialisation

You really need to post your patches properly.

In particular, you need to indicate, either in an initial "[PATCH 0/N]"
posting, or in the subject lines of that patch, exactly what tree
you are targetting.

And if this is meant for net-next, I told you specifically that net-next
is not open right now and you need to submit this later when I make
the announcement here that it is open.

We are in the middle of the merge window, and therefore you should only
be submitting bug fixes against the 'net' tree.

It is extremely irritating that, when I go out of my way to make
announcements here on this list, multiple times, about what kind of
patches are appropriate and what kinds are not, and yet people still
do not listen and they still submit any old crap they feel like
submitting.

People need to stop this, now.

Pay attention to the development state, and follow the rules,
otherwise you'll royally piss me off and I'll ignore your patches
completely.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html