[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FBC9E09.6010300@st.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 10:21:29 +0200
From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
To: Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, francesco.virlinzi@...com,
rayagond@...avyalabs.com, sr@...x.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers: net: stmmac: add blackfin support
Hello Bob Liu
On 5/23/2012 9:58 AM, Bob Liu wrote:
> Hi Peppe,
>
> On 5/22/12, Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com> wrote:
>> Hello Bob Liu
>>
>> On 5/22/2012 9:38 AM, Bob Liu wrote:
>>> Blackfin arch use stmmac on its reference board bf609-ezkit, the stmmac
>>> ip
>>> version is 3.61a.
>>>
>>> But the spec seems a little different, some register addr and define are
>>> not
>>> the same with current code.
>>>
>>> This patch add the support for blackfin arch following the spec.
>>
>> The 3.61a is supported and you have to point to the dw1000.h header file.
>>
>> To support this GMAC generation you only need to pass from the platform
>> the field has_gmac (see stmmac.txt).
>> Also the 3.61a has the HW cap registers so many internal fields (e.g. rx
>> coe, enhanced descr ...) will be fixed at run-time (although you can
>> pass them from the platform).
>>
>> Your patch adds the GMAC SPEC in the old MAC 10/100.
>>
>> Also I am reluctant to have specific ifdef <ARCH> within the code.
>> I do think the driver already has all the platform fields to run on your
>> board. If you need extra conf pls feel free to enhance the
>> plat_stmmacenet_data.
>>
>
> Thank you for your reply.
> I tried to use driver dwmac1000 by setting .has_gmac = 1 today.
> Ping can finish with no error but when rcp a file or telnet it will hang.
Hmm this should be debugged ... maybe you can verify the tx / rx
checksum. I mean if your IP has these modules or if, for somereason, the
HW cap register is not present and there are not properly fixed
>
> Using below patch without setting .has_gmac, everything works fine.
With your patch (that added the dwmac1000 into the dwmac100) you are
indeed using the MAC100 setting where by default there is no HW
checksumming ;-)
> Any ideas? Thank you.
you are welcome
Peppe
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac100.h
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac100.h
> index 7c6d857..00499b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac100.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac100.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,18 @@
> * MAC BLOCK defines
> *---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> /* MAC CSR offset */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_BLACKFIN)
> +#define MAC_CONTROL 0x00000000 /* MAC Control */
> +#define MAC_FRAME_FILTER 0x0000004 /* Frame filter */
> +#define MAC_HASH_HIGH 0x00000008 /* Multicast Hash Table High */
> +#define MAC_HASH_LOW 0x0000000c /* Multicast Hash Table Low */
> +#define MAC_MII_ADDR 0x00000010 /* MII Address */
> +#define MAC_MII_DATA 0x00000014 /* MII Data */
> +#define MAC_FLOW_CTRL 0x00000018 /* Flow Control */
> +#define MAC_VLAN1 0x0000001c /* VLAN1 Tag */
> +#define MAC_ADDR_HIGH 0x00000040 /* MAC Address High */
> +#define MAC_ADDR_LOW 0x00000044 /* MAC Address Low */
> +#else
> #define MAC_CONTROL 0x00000000 /* MAC Control */
> #define MAC_ADDR_HIGH 0x00000004 /* MAC Address High */
> #define MAC_ADDR_LOW 0x00000008 /* MAC Address Low */
> @@ -39,6 +51,7 @@
> #define MAC_FLOW_CTRL 0x0000001c /* Flow Control */
> #define MAC_VLAN1 0x00000020 /* VLAN1 Tag */
> #define MAC_VLAN2 0x00000024 /* VLAN2 Tag */
> +#endif
>
> /* MAC CTRL defines */
> #define MAC_CONTROL_RA 0x80000000 /* Receive All Mode */
> @@ -67,7 +80,11 @@
> #define MAC_CONTROL_TE 0x00000008 /* Transmitter Enable */
> #define MAC_CONTROL_RE 0x00000004 /* Receiver Enable */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLACKFIN
> +#define MAC_CORE_INIT ((1 << 14) | MAC_CONTROL_DBF)
> +#else
> #define MAC_CORE_INIT (MAC_CONTROL_HBD | MAC_CONTROL_ASTP)
> +#endif
>
> /* MAC FLOW CTRL defines */
> #define MAC_FLOW_CTRL_PT_MASK 0xffff0000 /* Pause Time Mask */
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists