[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OF40A553D6.951AAA8B-ON65257A08.003B5B83-65257A08.003B7B3A@in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 16:19:07 +0530
From: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: davem <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
fw@...len.de, kaber@...sh.net, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, sri@...ibm.com,
Sulakshan Vajipayajula <svajipay@...ibm.com>, vivk@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [v4 PATCH 1/1] netfilter: Add fail-open support
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote on 05/24/2012 04:11:56 PM:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:17:55PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > My main objection with this patch is that it adds more code out of the
> > scope of the nf_queue handling to nf_hook_slow. And this is done for
> > very specific purpose.
> >
> > @David, @Eric: Krishna aims to provide a mechanism that can be enabled
> > to accept packets if the nfqueue becomes full, ie. it changes the
> > default behaviour under congestion from drop to accept. It seems some
> > users prefer not to block traffic under nfqueue congestion.
>
> Florian Westphal just proposed some possible interesting solution for
> this.
Yes, and I have just finished testing this and it works fine. With
this, all the changes are localized to nfnetlink_queue.c. I am doing
some more tests before resubmitting this.
thanks,
- KK
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists