[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120529.172246.489250268136410473.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 17:22:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com
Cc: cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dledford@...hat.com, Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] rds_rdma: don't assume infiniband device is PCI
From: Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 15:15:18 -0500
> On 5/28/2012 1:52 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
>> RDS code assumes that the struct ib_device dma_device member, which is
>> a
>> pointer, points to a struct device embedded in a struct pci_dev.
>>
>> This is not the case for ehca, for example, which is a OF driver, and
>> makes dma_device point to a struct device embedded in a struct
>> platform_device.
>>
>> This will make the system crash when rds_rdma is loaded in a system
>> with ehca, since it will try to access the bus member of a
>> non-existent
>> struct pci_dev.
>>
>> The only reason rds_rdma uses the struct pci_dev is to get the NUMA
>> node
>> the device is attached to. Using dev_to_node for that is much better,
>> since it won't assume which bus the infiniband is attached to.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza
>> Cascardo<cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: dledford@...hat.com
>> Cc: Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com
>> Cc: Venkat Venkatsubra<venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com>
>> ---
>>
> Acked-by: Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com>
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists