[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1338366288.2760.115.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 10:24:48 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@...csson.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Martin Topholm <mph@...h.dk>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] tcp: Early SYN limit and SYN cookie handling
to mitigate SYN floods
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 10:03 +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> We have this option running right now, and it gave slightly higher values.
> The upside is only one core is running at 100% load.
>
> To be able to process more SYN an attempt was made to spread them with RPS to
> 2 other cores gave 60% more SYN:s per sec
> i.e. syn filter in NIC sending all irq:s to one core gave ~ 52k syn. pkts/sec
> adding RPS and sending syn to two other core:s gave ~80k syn. pkts/sec
> Adding more cores than two didn't help that much.
When you say 52.000 pkt/s, is that for fully established sockets, or
SYNFLOOD ?
19.23 us to handle _one_ SYN message seems pretty wrong to me, if there
is no contention on listener socket.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists