netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Faster/parallel SYN handling to mitigate SYN floods

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 May 2012 14:58:20 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
Cc:	christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Martin Topholm <mph@...h.dk>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
	Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@...csson.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Faster/parallel SYN handling to mitigate SYN
 floods

On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 14:51 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 00:40 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > That seems like a very unlikely situation, which we perhaps should
> > neglect as we are under SYN attack.
> >
> > I will test the attack vector, if we instead of dropping the reqsk,
> > fall back into the slow locked path.
> 
> I can provoke this attack vector, and performance is worse, if not
> dropping the reqsk early.
> 
> Generator SYN flood at 750Kpps, sending false retransmits mixture.
> 
> - With early drop: 406 Kpps
> - With return to locked processing: 251 Kpps
> 
> Its still better than the approx 150Kpps, without any patches.
> 

How many different IP addresses are used by your generator ?

Or maybe you disabled IP route cache ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html