[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC7940F.5010309@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 11:53:51 -0400
From: Hal Rosenstock <hal@....mellanox.co.il>
To: "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>
CC: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-rdma (linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org)"
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/25 v2] rdma/cm: define native IB address
On 3/7/2012 12:45 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Hefty, Sean <sean.hefty@...el.com> wrote:
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/socket.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/socket.h
>>>>> @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ struct ucred {
>>>>> #define AF_PPPOX 24 /* PPPoX sockets */
>>>>> #define AF_WANPIPE 25 /* Wanpipe API Sockets */
>>>>> #define AF_LLC 26 /* Linux LLC */
>>>>> +#define AF_IB 27 /* Native InfiniBand address */
>>>>> #define AF_CAN 29 /* Controller Area Network */
>>>>> #define AF_TIPC 30 /* TIPC
>> sockets */
>>>>> #define AF_BLUETOOTH 31 /* Bluetooth sockets */
>>>>> @@ -227,6 +228,7 @@ struct ucred {
>>>>> #define PF_PPPOX AF_PPPOX
>>>>> #define PF_WANPIPE AF_WANPIPE
>>>>> #define PF_LLC AF_LLC
>>>>> +#define PF_IB AF_IB
>>>>> #define PF_CAN AF_CAN
>>>>> #define PF_TIPC AF_TIPC
>>>>> #define PF_BLUETOOTH AF_BLUETOOTH
>>>>
>>>> Has this been run by the networking community? Are they OK with this
>>>> assignment?
>>>
>>> I did copy netdev on the original submissions, but I don't remember any
>> explicit ack or nack.
>>
>> David, any feeling yay or nay about adding these?
>>
>> Is the kernel the final arbiter of AF_xxx / PF_xxx assignments, or
>> is there anything else we have to worry about?
>
> To clarify the intent of this change:
>
> The RDMA CM allows users to specify addresses using struct sockaddr. Today, only INET/6 are supported.
> The intent is to allow a user to specify native InfiniBand addresses through that interface.
> In the more immediate, this helps to solve InfiniBand scaling issues.
Yes, this is key for InfiniBand scaling.
> Longer term, this can also be used to control path failover.
This AF_IB patch series appears to be stalled unless I missed something
on the list. What needs to be done to revive it/move it along ?
Thanks.
-- Hal
>
> - Sean
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists