[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120531.182001.608787450402251601.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 18:20:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shimoda.hiroaki@...il.com
Cc: therbert@...gle.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, denys@...p.net.lb,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/3] bql: Avoid unneeded limit decrement.
From: Hiroaki SHIMODA <shimoda.hiroaki@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 07:25:19 +0900
> When below pattern is observed,
>
> TIME
> dql_queued() dql_completed() |
> a) initial state |
> |
> b) X bytes queued V
>
> c) Y bytes queued
> d) X bytes completed
> e) Z bytes queued
> f) Y bytes completed
>
> a) dql->limit has already some value and there is no in-flight packet.
> b) X bytes queued.
> c) Y bytes queued and excess limit.
> d) X bytes completed and dql->prev_ovlimit is set and also
> dql->prev_num_queued is set Y.
> e) Z bytes queued.
> f) Y bytes completed. inprogress and prev_inprogress are true.
>
> At f), according to the comment, all_prev_completed becomes
> true and limit should be increased. But POSDIFF() ignores
> (completed == dql->prev_num_queued) case, so limit is decreased.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hiroaki SHIMODA <shimoda.hiroaki@...il.com>
Applied and queued up for -stable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists