netdev - Re: r8169: IO_PAGE_FAULT & netdev watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120602105645.GA28769@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date:	Sat, 2 Jun 2012 12:56:45 +0200
From:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To:	Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: r8169: IO_PAGE_FAULT & netdev watchdog

Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@...il.com> :
[...]
> So I went with 3.3.7, and patch failed to apply, at least partly because
> 3.3.7 lacks "r8169: fix early queue wake-up."[1].

And partly because the patch I sent included its content in the commit
message as well. :o/

> I solved the conflicts manually, but I'm not sure of the result. Could you
> confirm attached patch might give expected result ?

Yes.

> Or should I stick to 3.4 and only test inlined patch ?

If the inlined patch makes a difference, you should see it with 3.4.

My life is a bit easier when you work somewhere in the main branch
(or in davem's -next but it is not relevant for regression fixes).

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html