[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120604165619.15ba43bf@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 16:56:19 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...il.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Giancarlo Asnaghi <giancarlo.asnaghi@...com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] c_can_pci: generic module for c_can on PCI
> +enum c_can_pci_reg_align {
> + C_CAN_REG_ALIGN_16,
> + C_CAN_REG_ALIGN_32,
> +};
Anythign wrong with
bool aligned32;
> +
> +struct c_can_pci_data {
> + unsigned int reg_align; /* Set the register alignment in the memory */
Not the enum .. indeed
> +static u16 c_can_pci_read_reg_aligned_to_16bit(struct c_can_priv *priv,
> + void *reg)
I'm a bit worried this function name might be too short ;)
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s device registered (regs=%p, irq=%d)\n",
> + KBUILD_MODNAME, priv->regs, dev->irq);
dev_dbg
> + * do not call pci_disable_device on sta2x11 because it
> + * break all other Bus masters on this EP
> + */
> + if(pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_STMICRO &&
> + pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_STMICRO_CAN)
> + goto out;
Is that the disabling or the dropping it into D3. We have a PCI quirk
flag for the latter. See "quirk_no_ata_d3". That will also avoid any
accidents elsewhere. Right now the quirk has "ata" in the name but the
ata is just historically because we had to quirk various disk controllers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists