netdev - RE: [PATCH 0/1] net/hyperv: Use wait_event on outstanding sends during device removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <A1F3067C9B68744AA19F6802BAB8FFDC0DD6F82A@TK5EX14MBXC223.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date:	Mon, 4 Jun 2012 16:20:19 +0000
From:	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
	"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/1] net/hyperv: Use wait_event on outstanding sends
 during device removal



> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 11:51 AM
> To: Haiyang Zhang
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; KY Srinivasan; olaf@...fle.de; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...uxdriverproject.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] net/hyperv: Use wait_event on outstanding sends
> during device removal
> 
> From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> Date: Mon,  4 Jun 2012 07:35:31 -0700
> 
> > This patch is targeting net-next tree (when it's available for check
> in).
> >
> > Haiyang Zhang (1):
> >   net/hyperv: Use wait_event on outstanding sends during device
> removal
> 
> Why in the world are you doing this?
> 
> This patch you are already asking me to apply to the 'net' tree, and
> changes already will automatically propagate from 'net' to
> 'net-next' the next time I merge those trees.
> 
> So you never need to submit bug fixes twice, once for 'net' and
> once for 'net-next' so please do not do it.

A while ago, I was told the 'net' tree is only for urgent fixes, and I
should specify the target tree instead of letting you guess. But, that's
fine if you will apply it (after my updating the indentation) to 'net',
then merge it into 'net-next' tree automatically.

Thanks,
- Haiyang


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html