[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1338902613.2792.16.camel@Thor>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 09:23:33 -0400
From: Michel Machado <michel@...irati.com.br>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: add dev_loopback_xmit() to avoid duplicate code
>I'm getting really tired of saying this.
>
>As I announced several days ago, it is absolutely not appropriate
>to submit patches other than bug fixes at this time because we are
>in the merge window and the net-next tree is frozen.
>
>And even once I do announce here that the net-next tree is open
>once more, and patches like this one are appropriate, you must
>indicate in the subject line which of the 'net' or 'net-next'
>tree you are targetting your patch at.
>
>Please pay attention to what's going on, and what state the networking
>development trees are in, before submitting changes.
I am sorry. I'm still new to this process, and I clearly haven't found
my way yet. Accept my apology and consider that others making the same
mistake are likely trying to find their ways as well. Rest sure that I
do appreciate your time and work, I'll pay more attention on those time
windows.
Just to avoid bothering you further, should I resend this patch or not?
I saw at the link below that it's already marked as "Deferred".
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/160929/
Is there a link where I can check the state (i.e. open, frozen) of 'net'
and 'net-next' trees? I think keeping such page, and adding this link to
Documentation/SubmittingPatches would reduce similar mistakes.
--
[ ]'s
Michel Machado
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists