netdev - Re: [PATCH] e1000: save skb counts in TX to avoid cache misses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:02:58 -0700
From:	Jeff Kirsher <tarbal@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, rkagan@...allels.com,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
	bruce.w.allan@...el.com, carolyn.wyborny@...el.com,
	donald.c.skidmore@...el.com, gregory.v.rose@...el.com,
	peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
	john.ronciak@...el.com, dnelson@...hat.com,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000: save skb counts in TX to avoid cache misses

On 06/07/2012 02:43 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher <tarbal@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:38:17 -0700
>
>> Thanks! I have applied the patch to my queue
> Why?
>
> My impression is that this is a patch already in the tree, and it's
> being submitted for -stable but such minor performance hacks are
> absolutely not appropriate for -stable submission.
I did not catch that Roman was trying to get this into stable because
there was no mention of what stable kernels this was applicable back to
(and the fact that it was a performance).

I thought he had found an issue with the previous commits and was
suggesting a fix to the previous patches.

Since he is trying to get this into -stable, disregard my statement
about adding it to my tree.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (901 bytes)