[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120608003445.GC21150@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 01:34:45 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netdev: mv643xx_eth: Prevent build on PPC32
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 07:55:51PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:51:15AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This sort of issue is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of what it's
> > useful to do with the API.
> Yes, sounds like it. All I ask is that people test their patches along
> the way so things don't get broken. I mean, it's great we have an
> iceberg but I don't want tons of drivers on other architectures running
> into the thing and sinking because people aren't being careful. Except
> maybe the one already appropriately (nick)named.
It's really hard to blame the submitters here - this really isn't the
sort of API that you'd expect to only be available conditionally so this
isn't something that one would expect to have to worry about. It's a
product of the age of the clock API and the glacial progress on the
generic clock API.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists