| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CA+v9cxbogzS7sVChqkRMgDUcs=aJgNDRH8ydoQ-_htfS2t52gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:24:26 +0800
From: Huajun Li <huajun.li.lee@...il.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usbnet: Activate the halt interrupt endpoint to fix
endless "XactErr" error
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Huajun Li <huajun.li.lee@...il.com> wrote:
>> Ming, thanks for your comments.
>
> Welcome, :-)
>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Huajun Li <huajun.li.lee@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> There prints endless "XactErr" error msg once switch my device to the
>>>
>>> The "XactErr" error msg means that there are some transfer error in the bus,
>>> such as timeout, bad CRC, wrong PID, etc. Generally, -EPROTO is returned
>>> to driver if this kind of error happened.
>>>
>> Yes, you pointed out the why there printed the error.
>> However, how can this error(-EPROTO) happen? Actually, maybe it is
>> caused by malfunction device, bad usb cable, or other issues. In my
>> case, it is because the endpoint halts.
>
> If so, looks mistaken value is returned from the host controller driver,
> but not sure if your device is buggy. What is your host controller?
>
Nothing related to HC.
I tried to find out the endpoint state, but found it was halt. I think
this is the root cause.
> Also suppose your device is buggy, and the correct solution should
> be addding quirk for the driver to clear halt before the 1st submit status
> urb.
>
I ever worked out a patch just as you said and it could work.
However, if this can be fixed by common framework just like usbnet.c,
and there is no sideeffect, then why not.
>>
>>>> configuration
>>>> which needs cdc_ether driver, the root cause is the interrupt endpoint halts.
>>>
>>> How do you switch your configuration? by writing to
>>> /sys/.../bConfigurationValue?
>>>
>>
>> Maybe.
>> I were using a third party application to switch the configurations,
>> so I think it should use this way to do it unless there is other
>> approach.
>
> I just have tried to switch configuration by sysfs interface on the g_multi
> and don't trigger the error.
>
The driver is common one, but not just for a specific device.
>>
>>> Is the "XactErr" msg printed just after switching to cdc_ether interface
>>> by changing configuration?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, just as I mentioned in my original email.
>> And it did not work even I removed the driver and re-installed it.
>>
>>>> Maybe this is a common issue, so fix it by activating the endpoint
>>>> once the error occurs.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Huajun Li <huajun.li.lee@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> include/linux/usb/usbnet.h | 15 ++++++++-------
>>>> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c b/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c
>>>> index 9f58330..f13922b 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c
>>>> @@ -537,6 +537,11 @@ static void intr_complete (struct urb *urb)
>>>> "intr shutdown, code %d\n", status);
>>>> return;
>>>>
>>>> + case -EPIPE:
>>>> + case -EPROTO:
>>>
>>> It is good to handle EPIPE error here, but looks it is no sense to
>>> clear halt for
>>> bus transfer failure. At least, no clear halt is done for returning -EPROTO from
>>> rx/tx transfer currently.
>>
>> Just as I said above, there is different issue can cause -EPROTO, at
>> least, for my case it is because the interrupt endpoint is not active.
>> If the error occurs, the driver need try to fix it instead of just
>> printing an error msg.
>
> One problem in your patch is that if the -EPROTO is caused by bad cable
> or interference, clean halt may not be sent to device successfully, and will
> cause -EPROTO further.
What's your opinion to handle "-EPROTO" error in usbnet.c?
Please check usbnet.c again, when "-EPROTO" occurs, it just pints
error msg and re-submit the interrupt URB, and then causes endless
"EactErr" error msg.
At least, this patch lets the driver try to fix the error before
resubmit the URB.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> + usbnet_defer_kevent(dev, EVENT_STS_HALT);
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> /* NOTE: not throttling like RX/TX, since this endpoint
>>>> * already polls infrequently
>>>> */
>>>> @@ -967,6 +972,34 @@ fail_halt:
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + if (test_bit(EVENT_STS_HALT, &dev->flags)) {
>>>> + unsigned pipe;
>>>> + struct usb_endpoint_descriptor *desc;
>>>> +
>>>> + desc = &dev->status->desc;
>>>> + pipe = usb_rcvintpipe(dev->udev,
>>>> + desc->bEndpointAddress & USB_ENDPOINT_NUMBER_MASK);
>>>> + status = usb_autopm_get_interface(dev->intf);
>>>> + if (status < 0)
>>>> + goto fail_sts;
>>>> + status = usb_clear_halt(dev->udev, pipe);
>>>> + usb_autopm_put_interface(dev->intf);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (status < 0 && status != -EPIPE && status != -ESHUTDOWN) {
>>>> +fail_sts:
>>>> + netdev_err(dev->net,
>>>> + "can't clear intr halt, status %d\n", status);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + clear_bit(EVENT_STS_HALT, &dev->flags);
>>>> + memset(dev->interrupt->transfer_buffer, 0,
>>>> + dev->interrupt->transfer_buffer_length);
>>>
>>> The above is not necessary.
>>
>> Ming, do you mean the above one line, or others ?
>
> Yes, it is the above line.
>
Then not sure whether the buffer will be tainted without this line.
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists