| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <67d8beaf421874815145fdefc69b3366@visp.net.lb> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:56:12 +0300 From: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb> To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Deadlock, L2TP over IP are not working, 3.4.1 On 2012-06-08 18:41, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 07:47:18AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> I have no idea how many l2tp_eth devices are setup at once in >> typical >> conf. > > Depends on the usage scenario. L2TP is commonly used for terminating > customer connections by wholesale ISPs. In that kind of edge routing > use-case, tens of thousands of interfaces are easily possible. > > -ben In my case it is few hundreds. I am not sure it is typical case, but i really will like if this setup will give me good performance. Since Linux usually used on the PC's, i don't think they will scale more than 2-3 Gbps. Also L2TP pseudowire (l2tp_eth) usually done not directly to end-users, but to LAC's, so i think it is up to thousand. Right now i am routing around 700Mbps over there, and noticed some problem with pskb_expand_head, but that's separate question i will ask, if i will not be able to sort it out by myself. --- Denys Fedoryshchenko, Network Engineer, Virtual ISP S.A.L. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists