netdev - Re: [PATCH] inet: Initialize per-netns inetpeer roots in net/ipv{4,6}/route.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120610064748.GA10905@localhost>
Date:	Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:47:48 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <wfg@...ux.intel.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, gaofeng@...fujitsu.com,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inet: Initialize per-netns inetpeer roots in
 net/ipv{4,6}/route.c

On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 10:04:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:49:34 +0800
> 
> > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:43:39PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 09:21:47PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >> > From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...ux.intel.com>
> >> > Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:16:34 +0800
> >> > 
> >> > > In long run, such build-fix patches can also be auto tested and
> >> > > reported, somehow in this way. You just create a temporary branch
> >> > 
> >> > Sorry, no.
> >> 
> >> That's fine. Then how about including some text "fix build errors" or
> >> "fix build warnings" or paste the original gcc error/warning messages,
> >> somewhere in the changelog or subject?
> >> 
> >> That will also allow me recognize that it's a build fix commit and to
> >> make it unconditionally report back any build results.
> > 
> > Or better, simply include a 
> > 
> >         Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Now that on the other hand I should have done and was an oversight.

That's fine.

Please feel free to add that "Reported-by" to get verbose build report,
as well as to _NOT_ add the above line to avoid receiving reports when
the fix is obviously correct.

Ie. use the tag as a way to control my script.

> But all the other crap, is absolutely unreasonable of you to ask of me.

Yup.. Thanks for your time!

Regards,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html