[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FD4F494.6020102@iogearbox.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:25:08 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <danborkmann@...earbox.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] af_packet: check loop for greater than zero in tpacket_fill_skb
It could be more safe to check the 'to_write' for 'greater than zero'
instead for 'not zero'. 'to_write' is of type int and subtraction operations
are performed on it, so in the case of malformed values that are
subtracted from 'to_write', it could become less than zero, which is then
interpreted as 'not zero' in the while condition, thus the loop won't
return as expected.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel.borkmann@....ee.ethz.ch>
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
index 0f66174..3e53680 100644
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -2027,7 +2027,7 @@ static int tpacket_fill_skb(struct packet_sock *po, struct sk_buff *skb,
skb->truesize += to_write;
atomic_add(to_write, &po->sk.sk_wmem_alloc);
- while (likely(to_write)) {
+ while (likely(to_write > 0)) {
nr_frags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
if (unlikely(nr_frags >= MAX_SKB_FRAGS)) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists