netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: lpc_eth: Replace WARN() trace with simple pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1339442328.6001.2602.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:18:48 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kevin.wells@....com,
	srinivas.bakki@....com, aletes.xgr@...il.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: lpc_eth: Replace WARN() trace with simple
 pr_warn()

On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 11:26 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:

> Is it sensible at this point to increase the TX buffers anyway? For
> different reasons of course: We have enough SRAM available and TX
> buffers (16->32) are still more than RX buffers (48).

I doubt it has any impact on performance for a 100Mbit link ?

One thing that could be done would be to free skbs in
lpc_eth_hard_start_xmit() instead of __lpc_handle_xmit()



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html