lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:18:48 +0200 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kevin.wells@....com, srinivas.bakki@....com, aletes.xgr@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: lpc_eth: Replace WARN() trace with simple pr_warn() On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 11:26 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > Is it sensible at this point to increase the TX buffers anyway? For > different reasons of course: We have enough SRAM available and TX > buffers (16->32) are still more than RX buffers (48). I doubt it has any impact on performance for a 100Mbit link ? One thing that could be done would be to free skbs in lpc_eth_hard_start_xmit() instead of __lpc_handle_xmit() -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists