netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4: Add interface option to enable routing of 127.0.0.0/8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120611.165740.419299184892679723.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	tgraf@...g.ch
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4: Add interface option to enable routing
 of 127.0.0.0/8

From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 06:18:59 -0400

> -		if (i == IPV4_DEVCONF_ACCEPT_LOCAL - 1)
> +		if (i == IPV4_DEVCONF_ACCEPT_LOCAL - 1 ||
> +		    i == IPV4_DEVCONF_ROUTE_LOCALNET)

Why does one value get tested using "X - 1" indexing and the
other gets tested using plain "X" indexing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html