[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <84a4e0e6bbdc9206baefb1454324f4759a98b80e.1339404887.git.wpan@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:00:20 +0800
From: Weiping Pan <wpan@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 1/3] bonding:record primary when modify it via sysfs
If we modify primary via sysfs and it is not a valid slave,
we should record it for future use, and this behavior is the same with
bond_check_params().
Signed-off-by: Weiping Pan <wpan@...hat.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
index aef42f0..485bedb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
@@ -1082,8 +1082,12 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_primary(struct device *d,
}
}
- pr_info("%s: Unable to set %.*s as primary slave.\n",
- bond->dev->name, (int)strlen(buf) - 1, buf);
+ strncpy(bond->params.primary, ifname, IFNAMSIZ);
+ bond->params.primary[IFNAMSIZ - 1] = 0;
+
+ pr_info("%s: Recording %s as primary, "
+ "but it has not been enslaved to %s yet.\n",
+ bond->dev->name, ifname, bond->dev->name);
out:
write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
read_unlock(&bond->lock);
--
1.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists