netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/3] bonding:record primary when modify it via sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FD6B99C.7020305@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:38:04 +0800
From:	Weiping Pan <panweiping3@...il.com>
To:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
CC:	Nicolas de Pesloüan 
	<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>, Weiping Pan <wpan@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] bonding:record primary when modify it via sysfs

On 06/12/2012 04:48 AM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Nicolas de Pesloüan 	<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>  wrote:
>
>> Le 11/06/2012 11:00, Weiping Pan a écrit :
>>> If we modify primary via sysfs and it is not a valid slave,
>>> we should record it for future use, and this behavior is the same with
>>> bond_check_params().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Weiping Pan<wpan@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c |    8 ++++++--
>>>    1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
>>> index aef42f0..485bedb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
>>> @@ -1082,8 +1082,12 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_primary(struct device *d,
>>>    		}
>>>    	}
>>>
>>> -	pr_info("%s: Unable to set %.*s as primary slave.\n",
>>> -		bond->dev->name, (int)strlen(buf) - 1, buf);
>>> +	strncpy(bond->params.primary, ifname, IFNAMSIZ);
>>> +	bond->params.primary[IFNAMSIZ - 1] = 0;
>>> +
>>> +	pr_info("%s: Recording %s as primary, "
>>> +		"but it has not been enslaved to %s yet.\n",
>>> +		bond->dev->name, ifname, bond->dev->name);
>>>    out:
>>>    	write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
>>>    	read_unlock(&bond->lock);
>> I like this one, because it tend to relax the current constraints one
>> should respect on the order to write into sysfs to setup bonding.
>>
>> May I suggest we have a better info message, suggesting there might have a
>> typo on the name of the primary ?
>>
>>> +	pr_info("%s: Recording %s as primary, "
>>> +		"but it has not been enslaved to %s yet. Possible typo?\n",
>>> +		bond->dev->name, ifname, bond->dev->name);
>> Except from this cosmetic,
>>
>> Acked-by: Nicolas de Pesloüan<nicolas.2p.debian@...e.fr>
> 	Agreed, except that I can go either way on the "typo" warning.

I prefer not to add 'typo' since I think the log is enough.

thanks
Weiping Pan
> Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh<fubar@...ibm.com>
>
> 	-J
>
> ---
> 	-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@...ibm.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html