netdev - Re: Difficulties to get 1Gbps on be2net ethernet card

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1339491345.22704.22.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:55:45 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@...il.com>
Cc:	Sathya.Perla@...lex.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Difficulties to get 1Gbps on be2net ethernet card

On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 10:24 +0200, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> 2012/6/8 Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@...il.com>:
> > 2012/6/8 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>:
> >> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 10:14 +0200, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> >>> 2012/6/8 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>:
> >>> > On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:54 +0200, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 68:b5:99:b9:8d:d4
> >>> >>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:4096  Metric:1
> >>> >>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >>> >>           TX packets:15215387 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >>> >>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> >>> >>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:61476524359 (57.2 GiB)
> >>> >
> >>> >> qdisc mq 0: dev eth1 root
> >>> >>  Sent 61476524359 bytes 15215387 pkt (dropped 45683472, overlimits 0
> >>> >> requeues 17480)
> >>> >
> >>> > OK, and "tc -s -d cl show dev eth1"
> >>> >
> >>> > (How many queues are really used)
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> tc -s -d cl show dev eth1
> >>> class mq :1 root
> >>>  Sent 9798071746 bytes 2425410 pkt (dropped 3442405, overlimits 0 requeues 2747)
> >>>  backlog 0b 0p requeues 2747
> >>> class mq :2 root
> >>>  Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> >>>  backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> >>> class mq :3 root
> >>>  Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> >>>  backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> >>> class mq :4 root
> >>>  Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> >>>  backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> >>> class mq :5 root
> >>>  Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> >>>  backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> >>> class mq :6 root
> >>>  Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> >>>  backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> >>> class mq :7 root
> >>>  Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> >>>  backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> >>> class mq :8 root
> >>>  Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> >>>  backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> >>
> >>
> >> Do you have the same distribution on old kernels as well ?
> >> (ie only queue 0 is used)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > On the old kernel, there is nothing returned by this command.
> >
> > JM
> 
> I used perf in order to get more information.

What happens if you force some traffic in the other way (say 50.000
(small) packets per second in RX) while doing your tests ?




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html