lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1339505000.22704.132.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:43:20 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Bogdan Hamciuc <bogdan.hamciuc@...escale.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll: Add support for hardware checksumming on
 egress

On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 13:26 +0300, Bogdan Hamciuc wrote:
> Netpoll used to compute its own csum; but if the device supports, we
> should let it do the checksum itself.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Hamciuc <bogdan.hamciuc@...escale.com>
> ---
>  net/core/netpoll.c |   14 ++++++++++----
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
> index 9a08068..f5d00b4 100644
> --- a/net/core/netpoll.c
> +++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
> @@ -385,13 +385,19 @@ void netpoll_send_udp(struct netpoll *np, const char *msg, int len)
>  	udph->source = htons(np->local_port);
>  	udph->dest = htons(np->remote_port);
>  	udph->len = htons(udp_len);
> -	udph->check = 0;
> -	udph->check = csum_tcpudp_magic(np->local_ip,
> +
> +	/* Only querying the IPv4 csumming capabilities */
> +	if (np->dev->features & NETIF_F_IP_CSUM)
> +		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
> +	else {
> +		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
> +		udph->check = csum_tcpudp_magic(np->local_ip,
>  					np->remote_ip,
>  					udp_len, IPPROTO_UDP,
>  					csum_partial(udph, udp_len, 0));
> -	if (udph->check == 0)
> -		udph->check = CSUM_MANGLED_0;
> +		if (udph->check == 0)
> +			udph->check = CSUM_MANGLED_0;
> +	}
>  
>  	skb_push(skb, sizeof(*iph));
>  	skb_reset_network_header(skb);

Hi Bogdan

I cant see how this can possibly work ?

Which NIC was able to send a good UDP frame after this patch ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ