netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip: Use standard __set_bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP6odji_JvRkJP1dSzGK5ww3y71h4k6pXyj4pOQBpqP-X7Nn-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:21:18 -0700
From:	Grant Grundler <grantgrundler@...il.com>
To:	Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@...il.com>
Cc:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
	Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
	grundler@...isc-linux.org, arnd@...db.de, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	avi@...hat.com, mtosatti@...hat.com,
	linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip: Use standard
 __set_bit_le() function

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:00 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa
<takuya.yoshikawa@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:31:13 +0900
> Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> >> Should this hash_table be converted from u16 hash_table[32] to
>> >> DECLARE_BITMAP(hash_table, 16 * 32) to ensure that it is aligned
>> >> on long-word boundary?
>> >
>> > I think hash_table is already long-word aligned because it is placed
>> > right after a pointer.
>>
>> I recommend converting to proper bitmap.  Because such an implicit
>> assumption is easily broken by someone touching this function.
>
> Do you mean something like:
>        DECLARE_BITMAP(__hash_table, 16 * 32);
>        u16 *hash_table = (u16 *)__hash_table;
> ?
>
> Grant, what do you think about this?

Hi Takuya,
two thoughts:
1) while I agree with Akinobu and thank him for pointing out a
_potential_ alignment problem, this is a separate issue and your
existing patch should go in anyway. There are probably other drivers
with _potential_ alignment issues. Akinobu could get credit for
finding them by submitting patches after reviewing calls to set_bit
and set_bit_le() - similar to what you are doing now.

2) I generally do not like declaring one type and then using an alias
of a different type to reference the same memory address. We have a
simple alternative since hash_table[] is indexed directly only in one
hunk of code:
        for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
                *setup_frm++ = ((u16 *)hash_table)[i];
                *setup_frm++ = ((u16 *)hash_table)[i];
        }

thanks,
grant

>
>        Takuya
>
>
> ===
> drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/tulip_core.c:
>
> static void build_setup_frame_hash(u16 *setup_frm, struct net_device *dev)
> {
>        struct tulip_private *tp = netdev_priv(dev);
>        u16 hash_table[32];
>        ...
> }
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/de2104x.c:
>
> static void build_setup_frame_hash(u16 *setup_frm, struct net_device *dev)
> {
>        struct de_private *de = netdev_priv(dev);
>        u16 hash_table[32];
>        ...
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html