[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120615053707.GV27795@secunet.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:37:07 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Saurabh Mohan <saurabh.mohan@...tta.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 02/02] net/ipv4: VTI support new module for
ip_vti.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 07:43:59PM -0700, Saurabh Mohan wrote:
> > +
> > + iph->version = 4;
> > + iph->protocol = IPPROTO_ESP;
>
> Why IPPROTO_ESP? What's with the other IPsec protocols?
> Shouldn't this be IPPROTO_IPIP?
>
> @SM: VTI will work only with ESP not with AH (at least I have never heard of any one using it with AH). Plus I wanted to keep this module separate from IPIP (ip-in-ip tunnels).
>
VTI should be independent of the IPsec protocol.
Our IPsec implementation supports AH (and IPCOMP)
so VTI should support these protocols too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists