netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/8] dcbnl: Major simplifications

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120615072659.GD29738@canuck.infradead.org>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jun 2012 03:26:59 -0400
From:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To:	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
Cc:	alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, lucy.liu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] dcbnl: Major simplifications

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:06:20AM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 6/14/2012 12:54 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 03:55:41PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >>Lots of deleted code, I like it :-)
> >>
> >>Applied, but could you send a follow-on patch to use BUG_ON() instead
> >>of that "if (!ptr) { /* ... */ BUG(); }" construct?
> >
> >Sure, I must have had a weak moment right there :)
> >
> 
> Nice! I'm a bit late but dumped this into my dcbnl netlink test kit
> and everything looks good so...

Thank you for testing John. Are you referring to lldp/test/nltest.c?
I only discovered it after you mentioned a test kit. I've been feeding
a list of commands through dcbtool for testing so far.

BTW, I believe you mentioned at some point, that there is a patch
available allowing non net_device based DCB users to use dcbnl.
Otherwise I would start with the effort :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html