[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120617.162717.1814684296202502234.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: steffen.klassert@...unet.com
Cc: saurabh.mohan@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 02/02] net/ipv4: VTI support new module for
ip_vti.
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:37:07 +0200
> VTI should be independent of the IPsec protocol.
> Our IPsec implementation supports AH (and IPCOMP)
> so VTI should support these protocols too.
I agree with Steffen, it shouldn't require very much work to support
all of the 3 major IPSEC protocols. So if we are going to add a
feature like this I require that you completely flesh out the support
and support IPV6 as well.
Doing otherwise creates a terrible user experience.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists