[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340122632.2486.17.camel@lb-tlvb-eilong.il.broadcom.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:17:12 +0300
From: "Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>
To: "Yuval Mintz" <yuvalmin@...adcom.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, "Or Gerlitz" <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
"Divy Le Ray" <divy@...lsio.com>,
"Jitendra Kalsaria" <jitendra.kalsaria@...gic.com>,
"Ron Mercer" <ron.mercer@...gic.com>,
"Anirban Chakraborty" <anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com>,
"Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"Jon Mason" <jdmason@...zu.us>,
"Andrew Gallatin" <gallatin@...i.com>,
"Jon Mason" <mason@...i.com>,
"Subbu Seetharaman" <subbu.seetharaman@...lex.com>,
"Sathya Perla" <sathya.perla@...lex.com>,
"Matt Carlson" <mcarlson@...adcom.com>,
"Ajit Khaparde" <ajit.khaparde@...lex.com>,
"Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 00/14] default maximal number of RSS queues
in mq drivers
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 18:13 +0300, Yuval Mintz wrote:
> Different vendors support different number of RSS queues by default. Today,
> there exists an ethtool API through which users can change the number of
> channels their driver supports; This enables us to pursue the goal of using
> a default number of RSS queues in various multi-queue drivers.
>
> This RFC intendeds to achieve the above default, by upper-limiting the number
> of interrupts multi-queue drivers request (by default, not via the new API)
> with correlation to the number of cpus on the machine.
>
> After examining multi-queue drivers that call alloc_etherdev_mq[s],
> it became evident that most drivers allocate their devices using hard-coded
> values. Changing those defaults directly will most likely cause a regression.
>
> However, (most) multi-queue driver look at the number of online cpus when
> requesting for interrupts. We assume that the number of interrupts the
> driver manages to request is propagated across the driver, and the number
> of RSS queues it configures is based upon it.
>
> This RFC modifies said logic - if the number of cpus is large enough, use
> a smaller default value instead. This serves 2 main purposes:
> 1. A step forward unity in the number of RSS queues of various drivers.
> 2. It prevents wasteful requests for interrupts on machines with many cpus.
>
> Notice no testing was made on this RFC (other than on the bnx2x driver)
> except for compilation test.
>
> Drivers identified as multi-queue, handled in this RFC:
>
> * mellanox mlx4
> * neterion vxge
> * qlogic qlge
> * intel igb, igbxe, igbxevf
> * chelsio cxgb3, cxgb4
> * myricom myri10ge
> * emulex benet
> * broadcom tg3, bnx2, bnx2x
>
> Driver identified as multi-queue, no reference to number of online cpus found,
> and thus unhandled in this RFC:
>
> * neterion s2io
> * marvell mv643xx
> * freescale gianfar
> * ibm ehea
> * ti cpmac
> * sun niu
> * sfc efx
> * chelsio cxgb4vf
>
> Cheers,
> Yuval Mintz
>
> Cc: Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>
> Cc: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
> Cc: Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>
> Cc: Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com>
> Cc: Jitendra Kalsaria <jitendra.kalsaria@...gic.com>
> Cc: Ron Mercer <ron.mercer@...gic.com>
> Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Cc: Jon Mason <mason@...i.com>
> Cc: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@...i.com>
> Cc: Sathya Perla <sathya.perla@...lex.com>
> Cc: Subbu Seetharaman <subbu.seetharaman@...lex.com>
> Cc: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@...lex.com>
> Cc: Matt Carlson <mcarlson@...adcom.com>
> Cc: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>
Obviously we need to make the subject line more self-explanatory and
start with the component name followed by colon. We will fix it in the
next version of the patch, but please comment on the content.
Thanks,
Eilon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists