[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120619.142604.1446599238444016500.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Cc: eilong@...adcom.com, yuvalmin@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 01/14] Add Default
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:01:54 -0700
> There is a huge difference between a kernel parameter an a kconfig
> value. The main idea behind the kconfig value is that you are going to
> have different preferences depending on architectures and such so it
> would make much more sense to have the default as a config option.
I don't think the issue of how many queues to use in a network driver
when you have 1024 cpus is architecture specific.
Please drop this idea, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists