[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120618.230723.612232275251003129.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Early TCP socket demux.
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 06:37:41 +0200
> On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 21:27 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
>> How are we not using it? We use the cached SKB socket no matter what
>> happens.
>>
>> Look at how inet hash lookup works.
>>
>> The error tells the caller solely whether a route lookup is still
>> necessary.
>
> OK, remove the unlikely() in __inet_lookup_skb() so that its obvious we
> have this skb_steal_sock() thing :)
Sure thing.
We also need to add some dst->ops->check() handling as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists