netdev - Re: [PATCH] phy/micrel: change phy_id

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jason77.wang@...il.com
Cc:	david.choi@...rel.com, nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@...esas.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy/micrel: change phy_id_mask for KSZ9021 and KS8001

From: Hui Wang <jason77.wang@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:52:09 +0800

> On a freescale imx6q platform, a hardware phy chip KSZ9021 is
> recognized as a KS8001 chip by the current driver like this:
> eth0: Freescale FEC PHY driver [Micrel KS8001 or KS8721]
> 
> KSZ9021 has phy_id 0x00221610, while KSZ8001 has phy_id
> 0x0022161a, the current phy_id_mask (0x00fffff0/0x00ffff10) can't
> distinguish them. So change phy_id_mask to resolve this problem.
> 
> Although the micrel datasheet says that the 4 LSB of phyid2 register
> contains the chip revision number and the current driver is designed
> to follow this rule, in reality the chip implementation doesn't follow
> it.
> 
> Cc: David J. Choi <david.choi@...rel.com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@...esas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hui Wang <jason77.wang@...il.com>

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html