[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE0337F.6030000@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:08:31 +0800
From: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/12] netfilter: merge udpv[4,6]_net_init
into udp_net_init
于 2012年06月16日 19:22, Pablo Neira Ayuso 写道:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:41:17AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>> merge udpv4_net_init and udpv6_net_init into udp_net_init to
>> reduce the redundancy codes.
>>
>> and use nf_proto_net.users to identify if it's the first time
>> we use the nf_proto_net. when it's the first time,we will
>> initialized it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c | 56 ++++++++++---------------------
>> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
>> index 2b978e6..61bca4f 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
>> @@ -270,52 +270,32 @@ static int udp_kmemdup_compat_sysctl_table(struct nf_proto_net *pn)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void udp_init_net_data(struct nf_udp_net *un)
>> +static int udp_init_net(struct net *net, u_int16_t proto)
>> {
>> - int i;
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
>> - if (!un->pn.ctl_table) {
>> -#else
>> - if (!un->pn.users++) {
>> -#endif
>> + int ret;
>> + struct nf_udp_net *un = udp_pernet(net);
>> + struct nf_proto_net *pn = &un->pn;
>> +
>> + if (!pn->users) {
>> + int i;
>> for (i = 0; i < UDP_CT_MAX; i++)
>> un->timeouts[i] = udp_timeouts[i];
>> }
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int udpv4_init_net(struct net *net, u_int16_t proto)
>> -{
>> - int ret;
>> - struct nf_udp_net *un = udp_pernet(net);
>> - struct nf_proto_net *pn = (struct nf_proto_net *)un;
>>
>> - udp_init_net_data(un);
>> + if (proto == AF_INET) {
>
> I think we can remove that u_int16_t proto that I proposed to make
> something like:
>
> static int udp_kmemdup_compat_sysctl_table(struct nf_proto_net *pn)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> #ifdef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_PROC_COMPAT
> struct nf_udp_net *un = (struct nf_udp_net *)pn;
> +
> + if (pn->ctl_compat_table)
> + return 0;
> +
> pn->ctl_compat_table = kmemdup(udp_compat_sysctl_table,
> sizeof(udp_compat_sysctl_table),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pn->ctl_compat_table)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> That should be enough to ensure that the compat is registered once. No
> matter if it's done by the IPv4 or IPv6 invocation of udp_init_net.
>
> Thus, it will look consistent with udp_kmemdup_sysctl_table.
yes, but this will be very terrible to unregister compat sysctl
and free compat sysctl table.
thinking about, we may insmod nf_conntrack_ipv6 only, as your idea,
we will allocate compat_sysctl_table.so we have to free it when
rmmod nf_conntrack_ipv6.
in order to implement it, we have to change the logic of
nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl and nf_ct_unregister_sysctl. because we
only free the sysctl table when we unregister the proto.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists