lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE17522.5050005@profihost.ag>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:00:50 +0200
From:	Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@...fihost.ag>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 10GBE performance drop with net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps=0

Am 19.06.2012 23:31, schrieb Eric Dumazet:
> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 23:08 +0200, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>> i'm testing 10GBE speed with tweo servers. One with 3.5-rc3 nd thoe
>> other one whith RHEL 6 (2.6.32 kernel).
>>
>> I noticed that setting
>> net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps=0
>>
>> descreased the performance from 9,7 Full Duplex to 3-4Gb/s.
>>
>> Is this bahviour fine? What should / could i tet?
>>
>
> Really, you should provide more input than that, if you really want us
> to help.

*arg* forgot to add the pastebin links. Sorry. Speed degraded in this 
case from 9,88Gbit/s to 2,45Gbit/s. When i turn on timestamps it's 
perfect again. Server A has 3.5.0-rc3 and server B has an RHEL6 2.6.32 
kernel.

Before:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=1gVraWVc

After:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=NSh8Y29s

Thanks,
Stefan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ