[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340154206.6871.90.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:03:26 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ipv4: Early TCP socket demux.
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 17:54 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:21:06 +0100
>
> > This works only because MAX_INET_PROTOS is defined as 256, so that hash
> > == protocol. If we were ever to change MAX_INET_PROTOS then we would
> > need to add a whole lot of protocol checks, but this isn't particularly
> > obvious! Perhaps it would be better to remove the 'hashing' altogether?
>
> We never have changed the value and we never will.
Well that's what I expected.
> The hash is perfect, what's the big deal?
It obscures what we're really doing and relying on.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists