lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340181676.4604.838.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:41:16 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@...fihost.ag>
Cc:	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 10GBE performance drop with net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps=0

On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 10:21 +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> Am 20.06.2012 09:22, schrieb Eric Dumazet:
> > On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 09:00 +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> >> Am 19.06.2012 23:31, schrieb Eric Dumazet:
> >> Before:
> >> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=1gVraWVc
> >>
> >> After:
> >> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=NSh8Y29s
> >
> > You have a lot of packet losses
> But this ONLY happens with tcp_timestamps=0.
> 

Yes, you already told that in subject line.

single tcp flow ?

You seem to have a switch or something that drops packets in this case.

You could try to rate limit to 9Gb/s and see if it is better.

Here, I roughly have same bandwidth with tcp_timestamps on or off, with
ixgbe cards and net-next kernels.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ