[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340181676.4604.838.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:41:16 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@...fihost.ag>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 10GBE performance drop with net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps=0
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 10:21 +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> Am 20.06.2012 09:22, schrieb Eric Dumazet:
> > On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 09:00 +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> >> Am 19.06.2012 23:31, schrieb Eric Dumazet:
> >> Before:
> >> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=1gVraWVc
> >>
> >> After:
> >> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=NSh8Y29s
> >
> > You have a lot of packet losses
> But this ONLY happens with tcp_timestamps=0.
>
Yes, you already told that in subject line.
single tcp flow ?
You seem to have a switch or something that drops packets in this case.
You could try to rate limit to 9Gb/s and see if it is better.
Here, I roughly have same bandwidth with tcp_timestamps on or off, with
ixgbe cards and net-next kernels.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists