[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340644546.31710.6.camel@lappy>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:15:46 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: lauro.venancio@...nbossa.org, aloisio.almeida@...nbossa.org,
linville@...driver.com, davej@...hat.com,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFC: only put local on destruction if it was created
before
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 19:17 +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:08:19PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > Not having 'local' is a valid case when a socket was created but never
> > bound or connected to anything, so avoid putting 'local' if it was
> > never created.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
> > ---
> > net/nfc/llcp/sock.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp/sock.c b/net/nfc/llcp/sock.c
> > index 2c0b317..54daa10 100644
> > --- a/net/nfc/llcp/sock.c
> > +++ b/net/nfc/llcp/sock.c
> > @@ -710,7 +710,8 @@ void nfc_llcp_sock_free(struct nfc_llcp_sock *sock)
> >
> > sock->parent = NULL;
> >
> > - nfc_llcp_local_put(sock->local);
> > + if (sock->local)
> > + nfc_llcp_local_put(sock->local);
> nfc_llcp_local_put() already checks for its argument being NULL or not.
nfc_llcp_local_put() triggers a warning in this case as well, which
means that this code path shouldn't be happening.
Should we remove the WARN_ON from nfc_llcp_local_put() instead?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists