netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: avoid tx starvation by SYNACK packets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1340730156.10893.359.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:02:36 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@...csson.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"subramanian.vijay@...il.com" <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>,
	"dave.taht@...il.com" <dave.taht@...il.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ncardwell@...gle.com" <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
	"therbert@...gle.com" <therbert@...gle.com>,
	"brouer@...hat.com" <brouer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: avoid tx starvation by SYNACK packets

On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 07:34 +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:

> This patch didn't give much in gain actually.

With a 100Mbps link it does.

With a 1Gbps link we are cpu bounded for sure.

> The big cycle consumer during a syn attack is SHA sum right now, 
> so from that perspective it's better to add aes crypto (by using AES-NI) 
> to the syn cookies instead of SHA sum. Even if only newer x86_64 can use it.

My dev machine is able to process ~280.000 SYN (and synack) per second
(tg3, mono queue), and sha_transform() takes ~10 % of the time according
to perf.

With David patch using jhash instead of SHA, I reach ~315.000 SYN per
second.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html