[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE9568C.4040900@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:28:28 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: mst@...hat.com, akong@...hat.com, habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
tahm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, haixiao@...iper.net,
jwhan@...ewood.snu.ac.kr, ernesto.martin@...sat.com,
mashirle@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, krkumar2@...ibm.com,
shemminger@...tta.com, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] tuntap: per queue 64 bit stats
On 06/26/2012 02:10 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 14:00 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>> Yes, looks like it's hard to use NETIF_F_LLTX without breaking the u64
>> statistics, may worth to use tx lock and alloc_netdev_mq().
> Yes, this probably needs percpu storage (if you really want to use
> include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h).
>
> But percpu storage seems a bit overkill with a raising number of cpus
> on typical machines.
>
> For loopback device, its fine because we only have one lo device per
> network namespace, and some workloads really hit hard this device.
>
> But for tuntap, I am not sure ?
>
The problem is that we want to collect per-queue statistics. So if we
convert tuntap to use alloc_netdev_mq(), the tx statistics would be
updated under tx lock which looks safe.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists