netdev - Re: [net] ixgbe: Do not pad FCoE frames as this can cause issues with FCoE DDP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:09:28 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net] ixgbe: Do not pad FCoE frames as this can cause issues
 with FCoE DDP

On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 00:53 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 00:50 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > Sorry, quotes don't work either, what you did is still a SMTP syntax error,
> > here's what is in the bounce I get back:
> > 
> > 	<stable@...r.kernel.org> "[3.4]",
> > 	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> > Illegal-Object:	Syntax error in Cc: address found on vger.kernel.org:
> > 	Cc:	<stable@...r.kernel.org>"[3.4]"
> > 						^-missing end of address
> 
> Grrr...
> 
> I will re-send without the "[3.4]", Greg will just have to deal with it.

It's certainly not necessary to put anything like that in the real Cc
header. Many people put something like
'Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.4' in the body; I don't know if that
is more like likely to result in the version being stripped when
generating mail recipients.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Lowery's Law:
             If it jams, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)