[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120626075940.099521a7@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:59:40 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: Assign rtnl_link_ops to bridge devices created
via ioctl()
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:56:15 +0200
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> wrote:
> +void br_assign_rtnl_link_ops(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + dev->rtnl_link_ops = &br_link_ops;
> +}
I am fine with the concept, but maybe it would just be simpler to
make br_link_ops public?
--- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c 2012-06-22 08:27:50.837126940 -0700
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c 2012-06-26 07:56:33.510237340 -0700
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int br_validate(struct nlattr *tb
return 0;
}
-static struct rtnl_link_ops br_link_ops __read_mostly = {
+struct rtnl_link_ops br_link_ops __read_mostly = {
.kind = "bridge",
.priv_size = sizeof(struct net_bridge),
.setup = br_dev_setup,
--- a/net/bridge/br_private.h 2012-06-22 08:27:50.837126940 -0700
+++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h 2012-06-26 07:57:25.873711454 -0700
@@ -549,6 +549,7 @@ extern int (*br_fdb_test_addr_hook)(stru
#endif
/* br_netlink.c */
+extern struct rtnl_link_ops br_link_ops;
extern int br_netlink_init(void);
extern void br_netlink_fini(void);
extern void br_ifinfo_notify(int event, struct net_bridge_port *port);
--- a/net/bridge/br_if.c 2012-06-26 07:59:01.996746090 -0700
+++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c 2012-06-26 07:58:55.904807272 -0700
@@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ int br_add_bridge(struct net *net, const
return -ENOMEM;
dev_net_set(dev, net);
+ br->rtnl_link_ops = &br_link_ops;
res = register_netdev(dev);
if (res)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists