[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340832771.26242.160.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:32:51 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
Tom Parkin <tparkin@...alix.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David.Laight@...LAB.COM, James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] l2tp: use per-cpu variables for u64_stats updates
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 23:20 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 13:58 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>
> > It's worse than that: Even on 64-bit kernels, counters that are returned by
> > netlink and /proc/net/dev as 64-bit may still wrap themselves at 32-bit
> > intervals.
>
> Really ?
>
> Thats incredible you dont send a bug report then.
A bug report to the application author, not the kernel.
/proc/net/dev is an ASCII file, and nothing gives the width of a field.
Therefore, an application should cope with all cases (counter being a
32bit or 64bit integer), wrapping included.
Note that this has little to do with the application or kernel being
32/64 bit code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists