[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340902958.9286.1.camel@lolumad>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:02:38 +0200
From: Rostislav Lisovy <lisovy@...il.com>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, lartc@...r.kernel.org,
pisa@....felk.cvut.cz, sojkam1@....cvut.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] em_canid: Ematch rule to match CAN frames
according to their CAN IDs
On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 18:35 +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>
> What about
>
> match = (test_bit(can_id, cm->match_sff))?1:0;
>
> and working with "1" and "0" all the time instead of the final correction to
> the return values at the end of the function?
I agree;
Regards;
Rostislav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists