[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120628.180958.61012438467797240.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: phil@...m.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, phild@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow receiving packets on the fallback tunnel if they
pass sanity checks
From: Phil Dibowitz <phil@...m.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:37:35 -0700
> Sure. Sorry, I just kept Ville's patch description.
>
> We do Layer-3 DSR via IP-in-IP tunneling. Our load balancers wrap an extra IP
> header on incoming packets so they can be routed to the backend. In the v4
> tunnel driver, when these packets fall on the default tunl0 device, the
> behavior is to decapsulate them and drop them back on the stack. So our setup
> is that tunl0 has the VIP and eth0 has (obviously) the backend's real address.
>
> In IPv6 we do the same thing, but the v6 tunnel driver didn't have this same
> behavior - if you didn't have an explicit tunnel setup, it would drop the packet.
>
> This patch brings that v4 feature to the v6 driver.
>
> I think that's the level of detail you're looking for, but I'm happy to expand
> on anything in particular. I also break this down in tons of detail here:
This is a lot better, please resubmit the patch with a proper verbose
commit message, and please submit it properly and without any unrelated
content in the message body as described in Documentation/SubmittingPatches
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists