[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120701.223736.2073666097053189601.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 22:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: roy.qing.li@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] ipv6: remove unnecessary codes in
tcp_ipv6.c
From: RongQing Li <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 13:23:09 +0800
> 2012/7/2 David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
>> From: roy.qing.li@...il.com
>> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 11:18:59 +0800
>>
>>> - if (opt) {
>>> - newnp->opt = ipv6_dup_options(newsk, opt);
>>> - if (opt != np->opt)
>>> - sock_kfree_s(sk, opt, opt->tot_len);
>>
>> This is bogus, if we copy the options into a new copy in
>> ipv6_dup_options() we have to free the old one or else we
>> leak it.
>
> Do you mean I should free newnp->opt firstly ?
>
> If I understand it right, I think we do not need to free it. the
> process is below:
>
> newsk = tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock(sk, skb, req, dst);
> ..
> newnp = inet6_sk(newsk);
> ..
> memcpy(newnp, np, sizeof(struct ipv6_pinfo));
> ..
> newnp->opt = NULL;
>
> So newnp->opt is not a effective memory.
ipv6_dup_options() allocates new memory for the options and this call
statement assigns that new pointer to np->opt.
If you do not free the old (before ipv6_dup_options()) np->opt memory
here, it is lost forever.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists