[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF153F0.8080707@mellanox.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 10:55:28 +0300
From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <roland@...nel.org>
CC: <yevgenyp@...lanox.com>, <oren@...lanox.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <hadarh@...lanox.co.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/10] {NET,IB}/mlx4: Add device managed flow
steering firmware API
On 7/2/2012 12:42 AM, David Miller wrote:
> [...] Module parameters stink because every driver is going to provide
> the knob differently, with a different name, and different semantics.
> This creates a terrible user experience, and I will not allow it.
OK, so if looking on what we are left with on the table, seems that
sysfs entry on the mlx4_core
level (as we do for the port link type {IB, Eth} or IB port MTU) could
be fine here, Roland, agree?
Or.
We're talking on the /sys/bus/pci/devices entry for the card, e.g for a
card sitting
in 06:00.0 this new entry will be under /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:06:00.0/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists