[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120702194429.7c865c94@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 19:44:29 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: Volkan Yazıcı <volkan.yazici@...il.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Deleting an alias causes rest to get deleted
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 02:12:17 +0100
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 22:54 +0300, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I observe an IP aliasing anomaly that occurs when I try to delete an IP
> > alias from an interface. That is, when I delete the first address in a
> > set of IP aliased addresses assigned according to a particular subnet,
> > rest of the aliases get deleted as well. Check out the below snippet.
> [...]
> > As a side note, when I first asked this question to Stephen Hemminger
> > (he forwarded me to this mailing list) he also told me that "/In Linux
> > the interface aliases are really a legacy from the BSD style addressing,
> > and don't act the same. It is not common practice to use them./" Is that
> > really the case?
> [...]
>
> If you didn't give him the full details shown above, it's possible he
> thought you meant alias interfaces such as 'eth0:0'.
Yes, that is what I was assuming by the word 'alias'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists