netdev - Re: [PATCH] cgroup: fix panic in netprio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 05 Jul 2012 10:43:29 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...driver.com, tj@...nel.org,
	lizefan@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: fix panic in netprio_cgroup

On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 16:31 +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> we set max_prioidx to the first zero bit index of prioidx_map in
> function get_prioidx.
> 
> So when we delete the low index netprio cgroup and adding a new
> netprio cgroup again,the max_prioidx will be set to the low index.
> 
> when we set the high index cgroup's net_prio.ifpriomap,the function
> write_priomap will call update_netdev_tables to alloc memory which
> size is sizeof(struct netprio_map) + sizeof(u32) * (max_prioidx + 1),
> so the size of array that map->priomap point to is max_prioidx +1,
> which is low than what we actually need.
> 
> fix this by adding check in get_prioidx,only set max_prioidx when
> max_prioidx low than the new prioidx.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  net/core/netprio_cgroup.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c
> index 5b8aa2f..586f7d9 100644
> --- a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c
> +++ b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ static int get_prioidx(u32 *prio)
>  	}
>  	set_bit(prioidx, prioidx_map);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&prioidx_map_lock, flags);
> -	atomic_set(&max_prioidx, prioidx);
> +	if (atomic_read(&max_prioidx) < prioidx)
> +		atomic_set(&max_prioidx, prioidx);
>  	*prio = prioidx;
>  	return 0;
>  }

This is still racy.

Please do this before the 
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&prioidx_map_lock, flags);



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html